Case Study 3: Successful Proactive Investigations

Case Study 3 aims to demonstrate how proactive investigative approaches can uncover risks early, prevent misconduct from escalating, and strengthen institutional integrity. Highlight successful examples and share practical techniques that investigators can integrate into their work.
Screenshot
David Hawkes (WB)
Qing CHU
Qing Chu (UNFPA)
Ms. Qing Chu is an Investigations Specialist at the OAIS of UNFPA, with more than 13 years of  experience conducting investigations in both the UN system and the private sector. Her work has  included investigative roles with the World Bank Group, the United Nations Office for Project  Services (UNOPS), and UNFPA as well as serving as an Associate in the regulatory compliance  team at DLA Piper LLP. Ms. Chu holds a master’s degree in law, is admitted to practice law in  New York, and has also passed the bar exam in mainland China. 
Jung Min
Jung Min Han (ADB)
Jung Min Han is a Senior Integrity Specialist of the Office of Anticorruption and Integrity (OAI) at the Asian Development Bank (ADB), leading the Proactive Integrity Review (PIR) team since 2020.  Proactive integrity reviews are intended to help executing agencies, implementing agencies and ADB to identify and develop preventive measures to mitigate risks of fraud and corruption, improve project management, enhance project implementation, and replicate lessons learned for future projects.
Prior to joining ADB, Jung Min pursued a career in risk management advisory services, internal and external audit at various international financial institutions and Big 4 accounting firms across the United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the Republic of Korea.
Jung Min holds a Master of Business Administration degree (Finance) from New York University, and a Bachelor of Science degree from University of Virginia (Commerce).  She is a Certified Fraud Examiner, U.S. Certified Public Accountant, Certified Information Systems Auditor, and Certified Internal Auditor.

CII General Principles for Core Investigative Activities

Six volumes of General Principles for conducting core investigative activities that greatly expand on the principles within the CII’s Uniform Principles and Guidelines for Investigations. Endorsed at the 21st CII, these Principles provide more in-depth, principles-based, uniform guidance to investigators and Investigative Offices conducting these six core activities: Intake and Evaluation, Scoping and Planning, collection of Physical and Documentary Evidence, collection of Testimonial Evidence, collection of Digital Evidence and Evidence Analysis and Reporting of Findings.

As supplements to the CII’s Uniform Principles and Guidelines, each paper sets out non-binding principles establishing uniform standards to guide investigators and Investigative Offices undertaking these activities. They are purposely not prescriptive in technical details nor implementing practices. These Principles will also form the basis for a future CII Investigator Credential and CII Investigator training pathways.